Summary:
Use delete to disable automatic generated methods instead of private, and put the constructor together for more clear.This modification cause the unused field warning, so add unused attribute to disable this warning.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5009
Differential Revision: D17288733
fbshipit-source-id: 8a767ce096f185f1db01bd28fc88fef1cdd921f3
Summary:
Fix the following gcc-8 warnings:
- conflicting C language linkage declaration [-Werror]
- writing to an object with no trivial copy-assignment [-Werror=class-memaccess]
- array subscript -1 is below array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
Solves https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/3716
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3736
Differential Revision: D7684161
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 47c0423d26b74add251f1d3595211eee1e41e54a
Summary:
Summary
========
`InlineSkipList<>::Insert` takes the `key` parameter as a C-string. Then, it performs multiple comparisons with it requiring the `GetLengthPrefixedSlice()` to be spawn in `MemTable::KeyComparator::operator()(const char* prefix_len_key1, const char* prefix_len_key2)` on the same data over and over. The patch tries to optimize that.
Rough performance comparison
=====
Big keys, no compression.
```
$ ./db_bench --writes 20000000 --benchmarks="fillrandom" --compression_type none -key_size 256
(...)
fillrandom : 4.222 micros/op 236836 ops/sec; 80.4 MB/s
```
```
$ ./db_bench --writes 20000000 --benchmarks="fillrandom" --compression_type none -key_size 256
(...)
fillrandom : 4.064 micros/op 246059 ops/sec; 83.5 MB/s
```
TODO
======
In ~~a separated~~ this PR:
- [x] Go outside the write path. Maybe even eradicate the C-string-taking variant of `KeyIsAfterNode` entirely.
- [x] Try to cache the transformations applied by `KeyComparator` & friends in situations where we havy many comparisons with the same key.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3516
Differential Revision: D7059300
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 6f027dbb619a488129f79f79b5f7dbe566fb2dbb
Summary:
Currently DB does not accept duplicate keys (keys with the same user key and the same sequence number). If Memtable returns false when receiving such keys, we can benefit from this signal to properly increase the sequence number in the rare cases when we have a duplicate key in the write batch written to DB under WritePrepared transactions.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3418
Differential Revision: D6822412
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: adea3ce5073131cd38ed52b16bea0673b1a19e77
Lingjing You