Summary:
Replacement of #2147
The change was squashed due to a lot of conflicts.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2194
Differential Revision: D4929799
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: 5cd49c254737a1d5ac13f3c035f128e86524c581
Summary: After closely working with Mark, Siying, and Yueh-Hsuan this set of changes reflects the updates needed to measure RocksDB subcompaction performance in a correct manner. The essence of the benchmark is executing `fillrandom` followed by `compact` with the correct set of options for various number of subcompactions specified.
Test Plan: Tested internally to verify correctness and reliability.
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: MarkCallaghan
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D55089
Summary:
Implement a benchmark for universal compaction based on the feature description (see below), in-person discussions, and reading source code:
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/RocksDB-Tuning-Guidehttps://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Universal-Compactionhttps://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/RocksDB-Tuning-Guide#universal-compaction
Universal compaction benchmark is based on `overwrite` benchmark, adding compaction specific options to it, and executing it for different values of subcompaction to understand the impact of scaling out subcompactions for a particular scenario.
Test Plan:
- Execute the benchmark on various machines for multiple iterations to verify the reliability.
- Observe the output to make sure that compaction is taking place.
- Observe the execution to make sure that arguments passed to `db_bench` are correct.
Reviewers: sdong, MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: MarkCallaghan
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D54045
Summary: This set of changes is part of the work to introduce benchmark for universal style compaction in RocksDB. It's conceptually separate from the compaction work, so sending it out as a separate diff to get it out of the way.
Test Plan:
- Run `./tools/run_flash_bench.sh`.
- Look at the contents of `report.txt` and `report2.txt` to make sure that data is reported and attributed correctly.
- During `db_bench` execution time make sure that the correct flags are passed to `--disable_wal` depending on the benchmark being executed.
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: MarkCallaghan
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D53865
Summary:
Some of the tests aren't considered to be critical when it comes to getting key benchmarking data for RocksDB. Therefore we'll introduce an environment variable `SKIP_LOW_PRI_TESTS` which enables skipping those test cases. By default all the tests will be run. If you want to optimize the test-case execution then do the following:
`
$ export SKIP_LOW_PRI_TESTS=1
$ ./tools/run_flash_bench.sh
`
Test Plan: Verified that when `SKIP_LOW_PRI_TESTS` is not set then `benchmark.sh` is called for all the scenarios and when `SKIP_LOW_PRI_TESTS` is set to `1` then `benchmark.sh` is called only for the test-cases which are critical.
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: MarkCallaghan
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D53739
Summary:
1) changes tools/{benchmark,run_flash_bench}.sh to optionally use the write rate limit
2) removes code for --writes_per_second and switches the 'background' write rate limit
to use --benchmark_write_rate_limit
Replaces https://reviews.facebook.net/D49113
Task ID: #9555881
Blame Rev:
Test Plan:
tools/run_flash_bench.sh
Revert Plan:
Database Impact:
Memcache Impact:
Other Notes:
EImportant:
- begin *PUBLIC* platform impact section -
Bugzilla: #
- end platform impact -
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D52485
Summary:
Changes include:
* don't sync-on-commit for single writer thread in readwhile... tests
* make default block size 8kb rather than 4kb to avoid too small blocks after compression
* use snappy instead of zlib to avoid stalls from compression latency
* disable statistics
* use bytes_per_sync=8M to reduce throughput loss on disk
* use open_files=-1 to reduce mutex contention
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Test Plan:
run benchmark
Revert Plan:
Database Impact:
Memcache Impact:
Other Notes:
EImportant:
- begin *PUBLIC* platform impact section -
Bugzilla: #
- end platform impact -
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D44961
Summary:
This adds:
1) use of --level_compaction_dynamic_level_bytes=true
2) use of --bytes_per_sync=2M
The second is a big win for disks. The first helps in general.
This also adds a new test, fillseq with 32kb values to increase the peak
ingest and make it more likely that storage limits throughput.
Sample outpout from the first 3 tests - https://gist.github.com/mdcallag/e793bd3038e367b05d6f
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Test Plan:
Revert Plan:
Database Impact:
Memcache Impact:
Other Notes:
EImportant:
- begin *PUBLIC* platform impact section -
Bugzilla: #
- end platform impact -
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D37509
Summary:
This adds p99.9 and p99.99 response times to the benchmark report and
adds a second report, report2.txt that has tests listed in test order rather
than the time in which they were run, so overwrite tests are listed for
all thread counts, then update etc.
Also changes fillseq to compress all levels to avoid write-amp from rewriting
uncompressed files when they reach the first level to compress.
Increase max_write_buffer_number to avoid stalls during fillseq and make
max_background_flushes agree with max_write_buffer_number.
See https://gist.github.com/mdcallag/297ff4316a25cb2988f7 for an example
of the new report (report2.txt)
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Test Plan:
Revert Plan:
Database Impact:
Memcache Impact:
Other Notes:
EImportant:
- begin *PUBLIC* platform impact section -
Bugzilla: #
- end platform impact -
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D36537
Summary:
This makes run_flash_bench.sh configurable. Previously it was hardwired for 1B keys and tests
ran for 12 hours each. That kept me from using it. This makes it configuable, adds more tests,
makes the duration per-test configurable and refactors the test scripts.
Adds the seekrandomwhilemerging test to db_bench which is the same as seekrandomwhilewriting except
the writer thread does Merge rather than Put.
Forces the stall-time column in compaction IO stats to use a fixed format (H:M:S) which makes
it easier to scrape and parse. Also adds an option to AppendHumanMicros to force a fixed format.
Sometimes automation and humans want different format.
Calls thread->stats.AddBytes(bytes); in db_bench for more tests to get the MB/sec summary
stats in the output at test end.
Adds the average ingest rate to compaction IO stats. Output now looks like:
https://gist.github.com/mdcallag/2bd64d18be1b93adc494
More information on the benchmark output is at https://gist.github.com/mdcallag/db43a58bd5ac624f01e1
For benchmark.sh changes default RocksDB configuration to reduce stalls:
* min_level_to_compress from 2 to 3
* hard_rate_limit from 2 to 3
* max_grandparent_overlap_factor and max_bytes_for_level_multiplier from 10 to 8
* L0 file count triggers from 4,8,12 to 4,12,20 for (start,stall,stop)
Task ID: #6596829
Blame Rev:
Test Plan:
run tools/run_flash_bench.sh
Revert Plan:
Database Impact:
Memcache Impact:
Other Notes:
EImportant:
- begin *PUBLIC* platform impact section -
Bugzilla: #
- end platform impact -
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D36075
Summary: as title
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong, MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: MarkCallaghan
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D25563
Summary: Try to match some parameters from Dhruba's benchmarks on github
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24687
Summary:
Hope these scripts will allow people to run/repro benchmark easily
I think it is time to re-run flash benchmarks and report results
Please comment if any other benchmark runs are needed
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, MarkCallaghan, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23139
