Summary:
Run format check for .h and .cc files to clean the format
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10851
Test Plan: Watch CI tests to pass
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D40649723
fbshipit-source-id: 62d32cead0b3b8e6540e86d25451bd72642109eb
Summary:
Extend Java RocksDB iterators to support indirect byte buffers, to add to the existing support for direct byte buffers.
Code to distinguish direct/indirect buffers is switched in Java, and a 2nd separate JNI call implemented to support indirect
buffers. Indirect support passes contained buffers using byte[]
There are some Java subclasses of iterator (WBWIIterator, SstFileReaderIterator) which also now have parallel JNI support functions implemented, along with direct/indirect switches in Java methods.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/6282
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9222
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D35115283
Pulled By: jay-zhuang
fbshipit-source-id: f8d5d20b975aef700560fbcc99f707bb028dc42e
Summary:
This PR exposes the `Iterator::Refresh` method to the Java API by adding it on the `RocksIteratorInterface` interface. There are three concrete implementations: `RocksIterator`, `SstFileReaderIterator`, and `WBWIRocksIterator`. For the first two cases, the JNI side simply delegates to the underlying `Iterator::Refresh` method; in the last case, as it doesn't share an ancestor, and per the discussion in https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/3465, a `Status::NotSupported` exception is thrown.
As the last PR had no activity in a while, I'm opening a new one - I'm completely fine with merging the previous PR if it gets completed before this is reviewed.
Let me know if there's anything missing or anything else I can do 👍
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6573
Reviewed By: cheng-chang
Differential Revision: D20604666
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 4de17df1180c3b87b76cfdd77b674b81fc0563f7
Summary:
When dynamically linking two binaries together, different builds of RocksDB from two sources might cause errors. To provide a tool for user to solve the problem, the RocksDB namespace is changed to a flag which can be overridden in build time.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6433
Test Plan: Build release, all and jtest. Try to build with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE with another flag.
Differential Revision: D19977691
fbshipit-source-id: aa7f2d0972e1c31d75339ac48478f34f6cfcfb3e
Summary:
It is very useful to support direct ByteBuffers in Java. It allows to have zero memory copy and some serializers are using that directly so one do not need to create byte[] array for it.
This change also contains some fixes for Windows JNI build.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2283
Differential Revision: D19834971
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 44173aa02afc9836c5498c592fd1ea95b6086e8e
Summary:
Some recent commits might not have passed through the formatter. I formatted recent 45 commits. The script hangs for more commits so I stopped there.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5827
Test Plan: Run all existing tests.
Differential Revision: D17483727
fbshipit-source-id: af23113ee63015d8a43d89a3bc2c1056189afe8f
