Summary:
This PR adds user property collector factory `CompactForTieringCollectorFactory` to support observe SST file and mark it as need compaction for fast tracking data to the proper tier.
A triggering ratio `compaction_trigger_ratio_` can be configured to achieve the following:
1) Setting the ratio to be equal to or smaller than 0 disables this collector
2) Setting the ratio to be within (0, 1] will write the number of observed eligible entries into a user property and marks a file as need-compaction when aforementioned condition is met.
3) Setting the ratio to be higher than 1 can be used to just writes the user table property, and not mark any file as need compaction.
For a column family that does not enable tiering feature, even if an effective configuration is provided, this collector is still disabled. For a file that is already on the last level, this collector is also disabled.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/12760
Test Plan: Added unit tests
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D58734976
Pulled By: jowlyzhang
fbshipit-source-id: 6daab2c4f62b5c6689c3c03e3b3907bbbe6b7a81
Summary:
I've always found this name difficult to read, because it sounds like it's for collecting int(eger)
table properties.
I'm fixing this now to set up for a change that I have stubbed out in the public API (table_properties.h):
a new adapter function `TablePropertiesCollector::AsInternal()` that allows RocksDB-provided
TablePropertiesCollectors (such as CompactOnDeletionCollector) to implement the easier-to-upgrade
internal interface while still (superficially) implementing the public interface. In addition to added flexibility,
this should be a performance improvement as the adapter class UserKeyTablePropertiesCollector can be
avoided for such cases where a RocksDB-provided collector is used (AsInternal() returns non-nullptr).
table_properties.h is the only file with changes that aren't simple find-replace renaming.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/12320
Test Plan: existing tests, CI
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D53336945
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 02535bcb30bbfb00e29e8478af62e5dad50a63b8
Summary:
As part of building another feature, I wanted this:
* Custom implementations of `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory` may now return a `nullptr` collector to decline processing a file, reducing callback overheads in such cases.
* Polished, clarified some related API comments.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/12129
Test Plan: unit test added
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D51966667
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 2991c08fe6ce3a8c9f14c68f1495f5a17bca2770
Summary:
when the compaction output file is empty, the assertion in `TimestampTablePropertiesCollector::Finish()` breaks. This PR fixes this assert and added unit test.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11015
Test Plan: added UT.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D41716719
Pulled By: cbi42
fbshipit-source-id: d891d46be4c4805e3d49be6b80c9d75f1bd51080
Summary:
We have a lot of confusing code because of mixed, sometimes
completely opposite uses of of the term "raw block" or "raw contents",
sometimes within the same source file. For example, in `BlockBasedTableBuilder`,
`raw_block_contents` and `raw_size` generally referred to uncompressed block
contents and size, while `WriteRawBlock` referred to writing a block that
is already compressed if it is going to be. Meanwhile, in
`BlockBasedTable`, `raw_block_contents` either referred to a (maybe
compressed) block with trailer, or a maybe compressed block maybe
without trailer. (Note: left as follow-up work to use C++ typing to
better sort out the various kinds of BlockContents.)
This change primarily tries to apply some consistent terminology around
the kinds of block representations, avoiding the unclear "raw". (Any
meaning of "raw" assumes some bias toward the storage layer or toward
the logical data layer.) Preferred terminology:
* **Serialized block** - bytes that go into storage. For block-based table
(usually the case) this includes the block trailer. WART: block `size` may or
may not include the trailer; need to be clear about whether it does or not.
* **Maybe compressed block** - like a serialized block, but without the
trailer (or no promise of including a trailer). Must be accompanied by a
CompressionType.
* **Uncompressed block** - "payload" bytes that are either stored with no
compression, used as input to compression function, or result of
decompression function.
* **Parsed block** - an in-memory form of a block in block cache, as it is
used by the table reader. Different C++ types are used depending on the
block type (see block_like_traits.h).
Other refactorings:
* Misc corrections/improvements of internal API comments
* Remove a few misleading / unhelpful / redundant comments.
* Use move semantics in some places to simplify contracts
* Use better parameter names to indicate which parameters are used for
outputs
* Remove some extraneous `extern`
* Various clean-ups to `CacheDumperImpl` (mostly unnecessary code)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10408
Test Plan: existing tests
Reviewed By: akankshamahajan15
Differential Revision: D38172617
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: ccb99299f324ac5ca46996d34c5089621a4f260c
Summary:
Track each SST's timestamp information as user properties https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8959
Rockdb has supported user-defined timestamp feature. Application can specify a timestamp
when writing each k-v pair. When data flush from memory to disk file called SST files.
Each SST files consist of multiple data blocks and several metadata blocks. Among the metadata
blocks, there is one called Properties block that tracks some pre-defined properties of this SST file.
This PR is for collecting the properties of min and max timestamps of all keys in the file. With those
properties the SST file is more convenient to tell whether the keys in the SST have timestamps or not.
The changes involved are as follows:
1) Add a class TimestampTablePropertiesCollector to collect min/max timestamp when add keys to table,
The way TimestampTablePropertiesCollector use to compare timestamp of key should defined by
user by implementing the Comparator::CompareTimestamp function in the user defined comparator.
2) Add corresponding unit tests.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9093
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D32406927
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: 25922971b7e67bacf4d53a1fb67c4c5ddaa61573
Summary:
Context:
Exposing the level of the sst file (i.e, table) where it is created in `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::Context` allows users of `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory` to customize some implementation details of `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory` and `TablePropertiesCollector` based on the level of creation. For example, `TablePropertiesCollector::NeedCompact()` can return different values based on level of creation.
- Declared an extra field `level_at_creation` in `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::Context`
- Allowed `level_at_creation` to be passed in as an argument in `IntTblPropCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` and `UserKeyTablePropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()`, the latter of which is an internal wrapper of user's passed-in `TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateTablePropertiesCollector()` used in table-building process
- Called `IntTblPropCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` with `level_at_creation` passed into both `BlockBasedTableBuilder` and `PlainTableBuilder`
- `PlainTableBuilder` previously did not capture `level_at_creation` from `TableBuilderOptions` in `PlainTableFactory`. In order for it to call the method with this parameter, this PR also made `PlainTableBuilder` capture `level_at_creation` as a required parameter
- Called `IntTblPropCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` with `level_at_creation` its overridden functions in its derived classes, including `RegularKeysStartWithAFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` in `table_properties_collector_test.cc`, `SstFileWriterPropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateIntTblPropCollector()` in `sst_file_writer_collectors.h`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8919
Test Plan:
- Passed the added assertion for `context.level_at_creation`
- Passed existing tests
- Run `Make` to make sure adding a required parameter to `PlainTableBuilder`'s constructor does not break anything
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D30951729
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: c4a0173b0d9344a4cf47e1b987d759c1c73cb474
Summary:
We ended up using a different approach for tracking the amount of
garbage in blob files (see e.g. https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8450),
so the ability to apply only a range of table property collectors is
now unnecessary. The patch reverts this part of
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8298 while keeping the cleanup done
in that PR.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8465
Test Plan: `make check`
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D29399921
Pulled By: ltamasi
fbshipit-source-id: af64816c357d0829b9d7ba8ca1477038138f6f0a
Summary:
This patch does two things:
1) Introduces some aliases in order to eliminate/prevent long-winded type names
w/r/t the internal table property collectors (see e.g.
`std::vector<std::unique_ptr<IntTblPropCollectorFactory>>`).
2) Makes it possible to apply only a subrange of table property collectors during
table building by turning `TableBuilderOptions::int_tbl_prop_collector_factories`
from a pointer to a `vector` into a range (i.e. a pair of iterators).
Rationale: I plan to introduce a BlobDB related table property collector, which
should only be applied during table creation if blob storage is enabled at the moment
(which can be changed dynamically). This change will make it possible to include/
exclude the BlobDB related collector as needed without having to introduce
a second `vector` of collectors in `ColumnFamilyData` with pretty much the same
contents.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8298
Test Plan: `make check`
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D28430910
Pulled By: ltamasi
fbshipit-source-id: a81d28f2c59495865300f43deb2257d2e6977c8e
Summary:
Previously it only applied to block-based tables generated by flush. This restriction
was undocumented and blocked a new use case. Now compression sampling
applies to all block-based tables we generate when it is enabled.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8105
Test Plan: new unit test
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D27317275
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: cd9fcc5178d6515e8cb59c6facb5ac01893cb5b0
Summary:
When dynamically linking two binaries together, different builds of RocksDB from two sources might cause errors. To provide a tool for user to solve the problem, the RocksDB namespace is changed to a flag which can be overridden in build time.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6433
Test Plan: Build release, all and jtest. Try to build with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE with another flag.
Differential Revision: D19977691
fbshipit-source-id: aa7f2d0972e1c31d75339ac48478f34f6cfcfb3e
Summary:
This is a feature to sample data-block compressibility and and report them as stats. 1 in N (tunable) blocks is sampled for compressibility using two algorithms:
1. lz4 or snappy for fast compression
2. zstd or zlib for slow but higher compression.
The stats are reported to the caller as raw-bytes and compressed-bytes. The block continues to be compressed for storage using the specified CompressionType.
The db_bench_tool how has a command line option for specifying the sampling rate. It's default value is 0 (no sampling). To test the overhead for a certain value, users can compare the performance of db_bench_tool, varying the sampling rate. It is unlikely to have a noticeable impact for high values like 20.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4842
Differential Revision: D13629011
Pulled By: shobhitdayal
fbshipit-source-id: 14ca668bcab6499b2a1734edf848eb62a4f4fafa
Summary:
Since the number of range deletions are reported in
TableProperties, it is confusing to not report the number of merge
operands and point deletions as top-level properties; they are
accessible through the public API, but since they are not the "main"
properties, they do not appear in aggregated table properties, or the
string representation of table properties.
This change promotes those two property keys to
`rocksdb/table_properties.h`, adds corresponding uint64 members for
them, deprecates the old access methods `GetDeletedKeys()` and
`GetMergeOperands()` (though they are still usable for now), and removes
`InternalKeyPropertiesCollector`. The property key strings are the same
as before this change, so this should be able to read DBs written from older
versions (though I haven't tested this yet).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4594
Differential Revision: D12826893
Pulled By: abhimadan
fbshipit-source-id: 9e4e4fbdc5b0da161c89582566d184101ba8eb68
Summary:
This reverts the previous commit 1d7048c598, which broke the build.
Did a `git revert 1d7048c`.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2627
Differential Revision: D5476473
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: 4756ff5c0dfc88c17eceb00e02c36176de728d06
Summary: This uses `clang-tidy` to comment out unused parameters (in functions, methods and lambdas) in fbcode. Cases that the tool failed to handle are fixed manually.
Reviewed By: igorsugak
Differential Revision: D5454343
fbshipit-source-id: 5dee339b4334e25e963891b519a5aa81fbf627b2
Summary:
A couple of notes from the diff:
- The namespace block I added at the top of table_properties_collector.cc was in reaction to an issue i was having with PutVarint64 and reusing the "val" string. I'm not sure this is the cleanest way of doing this, but abstracting this out at least results in the correct behavior.
- I chose "rocksdb.merge.operands" as the property name. I am open to suggestions for better names.
- The change to sst_dump_tool.cc seems a bit inelegant to me. Is there a better way to do the if-else block?
Test Plan:
I added a test case in table_properties_collector_test.cc. It adds two merge operands and checks to make sure that both of them are reflected by GetMergeOperands. It also checks to make sure the wasPropertyPresent bool is properly set in the method.
Running both of these tests should pass:
./table_properties_collector_test
./sst_dump_test
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D58119
Summary: Pass column family ID through TablePropertiesCollectorFactory::CreateTablePropertiesCollector() so that users can identify which column family this file is for and handle it differently.
Test Plan: Add unit test scenarios in tests related to table properties collectors to verify the information passed in is correct.
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, anthony, kradhakrishnan, igor, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: yoshinorim, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48411
Summary:
This is an initial version of bulk load feature
This diff allow us to create sst files, and then bulk load them later, right now the restrictions for loading an sst file are
(1) Memtables are empty
(2) Added sst files have sequence number = 0, and existing values in database have sequence number = 0
(3) Added sst files values are not overlapping
Test Plan: unit testing
Reviewers: igor, ott, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb, ott, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39081
Summary:
It is experimental. Allow users to return from a call back function TablePropertiesCollector::NeedCompact(), based on the data in the file.
It can be used to allow users to suggest DB to clear up delete tombstones faster.
Test Plan: Add a unit test.
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, rven
Reviewed By: rven
Subscribers: yoshinorim, MarkCallaghan, maykov, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39585
Summary:
Currently users have no idea a key is add, delete or merge from TablePropertiesCollector call back. Add a new function to add it.
Also refactor the codes so that
(1) make table property collector and internal table property collector two separate data structures with the later one now exposed
(2) table builders only receive internal table properties
Test Plan: Add cases in table_properties_collector_test to cover both of old and new ways of using TablePropertiesCollector.
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor.sugak, rven, igor
Reviewed By: rven, igor
Subscribers: meyering, yoshinorim, maykov, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D35373
Summary:
When using latest clang (3.6 or 3.7/trunck) rocksdb is failing with many errors. Almost all of them are missing override errors. This diff adds missing override keyword. No manual changes.
Prerequisites: bear and clang 3.5 build with extra tools
```lang=bash
% USE_CLANG=1 bear make all # generate a compilation database http://clang.llvm.org/docs/JSONCompilationDatabase.html
% clang-modernize -p . -include . -add-override
% make format
```
Test Plan:
Make sure all tests are passing.
```lang=bash
% #Use default fb code clang.
% make check
```
Verify less error and no missing override errors.
```lang=bash
% # Have trunk clang present in path.
% ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE=1 CC=clang CXX=clang++ make
```
Reviewers: igor, kradhakrishnan, rven, meyering, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34077
Summary:
This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options.
Here's description of task #4296714:
I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB.
For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys.
The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for.
Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API.
In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe.
Test Plan:
Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one).
Also, all other tests
Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
Summary: This change will allow other table to reuse the code for meta blocks.
Test Plan: all existing unit tests passed
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14475
Summary:
The primary motivation of the changes is to make it easier to figure out the inside of the tables.
* rename "table stats" to "table properties" since now we have more than "integers" to store in the property block.
* Add filter block size to the basic table properties.
* Whenever a table is built, we'll log the table properties (the sample output is in Test Plan).
* Make an api to expose deleted keys.
Test Plan:
Passed all existing test. and the sample output of table stats:
==================================================================
Basic Properties
------------------------------------------------------------------
# data blocks: 1
# entries: 1
raw key size: 9
raw average key size: 9
raw value size: 9
raw average value size: 0
data block size: 25
index block size: 27
filter block size: 18
(estimated) table size: 70
filter policy: rocksdb.BuiltinBloomFilter
==================================================================
User collected properties: InternalKeyPropertiesCollector
------------------------------------------------------------------
kDeletedKeys: 1
==================================================================
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14187
Yu Zhang