Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Igor Canadi 0acc738810 Speed up FindObsoleteFiles()
Summary:
There are two versions of FindObsoleteFiles():
* full scan, which is executed every 6 hours (and it's terribly slow)
* no full scan, which is executed every time a background process finishes and iterator is deleted

This diff is optimizing the second case (no full scan). Here's what we do before the diff:
* Get the list of obsolete files (files with ref==0). Some files in obsolete_files set might actually be live.
* Get the list of live files to avoid deleting files that are live.
* Delete files that are in obsolete_files and not in live_files.

After this diff:
* The only files with ref==0 that are still live are files that have been part of move compaction. Don't include moved files in obsolete_files.
* Get the list of obsolete files (which exclude moved files).
* No need to get the list of live files, since all files in obsolete_files need to be deleted.

I'll post the benchmark results, but you can get the feel of it here: https://reviews.facebook.net/D30123

This depends on D30123.

P.S. We should do full scan only in failure scenarios, not every 6 hours. I'll do this in a follow-up diff.

Test Plan:
One new unit test. Made sure that unit test fails if we don't have a `if (!f->moved)` safeguard in ~Version.

make check

Big number of compactions and flushes:

  ./db_stress --threads=30 --ops_per_thread=20000000 --max_key=10000 --column_families=20 --clear_column_family_one_in=10000000 --verify_before_write=0  --reopen=15 --max_background_compactions=10 --max_background_flushes=10 --db=/fast-rocksdb-tmp/db_stress --prefixpercent=0 --iterpercent=0 --writepercent=75 --db_write_buffer_size=2000000

Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, sdong

Reviewed By: sdong

Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D30249
2014-12-22 12:04:45 +01:00
Igor Canadi 5c04acda08 Explicitly clean JobContext
Summary: This way we can gurantee that old MemTables get destructed before DBImpl gets destructed, which might be useful if we want to make them depend on state from DBImpl.

Test Plan: make check with asserts in JobContext's destructor

Reviewers: ljin, sdong, yhchiang, rven, jonahcohen

Reviewed By: jonahcohen

Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28959
2014-11-14 15:43:10 -08:00
Igor Canadi 53af5d877d Redesign pending_outputs_
Summary:
Here's a prototype of redesigning pending_outputs_. This way, we don't have to expose pending_outputs_ to other classes (CompactionJob, FlushJob, MemtableList). DBImpl takes care of it.

Still have to write some comments, but should be good enough to start the discussion.

Test Plan: make check, will also run stress test

Reviewers: ljin, sdong, rven, yhchiang

Reviewed By: yhchiang

Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28353
2014-11-07 11:50:34 -08:00
Igor Canadi a39e931e50 FlushProcess
Summary:
Abstract out FlushProcess and take it out of DBImpl.
This also includes taking DeletionState outside of DBImpl.

Currently this diff is only doing the refactoring. Future work includes:
1. Decoupling flush_process.cc, make it depend on less state
2. Write flush_process_test, which will mock out everything that FlushProcess depends on and test it in isolation

Test Plan: make check

Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, sdong, ljin

Reviewed By: ljin

Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27561
2014-10-28 11:54:33 -07:00