Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Wentian Guo 42d6652ba2 remove dependency on options.h for port_posix.h andport_win.h (#11214)
Summary:
The files in `port/`, such as `port_posix.h`, are layering over the system libraries, so shouldn't include the DB-specific files like `options.h`. This PR remove this dependency.

# How
The reason that `port_posix.h` (or `port_win.h`) include `options.h` is to use `CpuPriority`, as there is a method `SetCpuPriority()` in `port_posix.h` that uses `CpuPriority.`
- I think `SetCpuPriority()` make sense to exist in `port_posix.h` as it provides has platform-dependent implementation
- `CpuPriority` enum is defined in `env.h`, but used in `rocksdb/include` and `port/`.

Hence, let us define `CpuPriority` enum in a common file, say `port_defs.h`, such that both directories `rocksdb/include` and `port/` can include.

When we remove this dependency, some other files have compile errors because they can't find definitions, so add header files to resolve

# Test
make all check -j

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11214

Reviewed By: pdillinger

Differential Revision: D43196910

Pulled By: guowentian

fbshipit-source-id: 70deccb72844cfb08fcc994f76c6ef6df5d55ab9
2023-02-13 02:21:38 -08:00
Peter Dillinger 1aac814578 Use optimized folly DistributedMutex in LRUCache when available (#10179)
Summary:
folly DistributedMutex is faster than standard mutexes though
imposes some static obligations on usage. See
https://github.com/facebook/folly/blob/main/folly/synchronization/DistributedMutex.h
for details. Here we use this alternative for our Cache implementations
(especially LRUCache) for better locking performance, when RocksDB is
compiled with folly.

Also added information about which distributed mutex implementation is
being used to cache_bench output and to DB LOG.

Intended follow-up:
* Use DMutex in more places, perhaps improving API to support non-scoped
locking
* Fix linking with fbcode compiler (needs ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE=1 currently)

Credit: Thanks Siying for reminding me about this line of work that was previously
left unfinished.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10179

Test Plan:
for correctness, existing tests. CircleCI config updated.
Also Meta-internal buck build updated.

For performance, ran simultaneous before & after cache_bench. Out of three
comparison runs, the middle improvement to ops/sec was +21%:

Baseline: USE_CLANG=1 DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make -j24 cache_bench (fbcode
compiler)

```
Complete in 20.201 s; Rough parallel ops/sec = 1584062
Thread ops/sec = 107176

Operation latency (ns):
Count: 32000000 Average: 9257.9421  StdDev: 122412.04
Min: 134  Median: 3623.0493  Max: 56918500
Percentiles: P50: 3623.05 P75: 10288.02 P99: 30219.35 P99.9: 683522.04 P99.99: 7302791.63
```

New: (add USE_FOLLY=1)

```
Complete in 16.674 s; Rough parallel ops/sec = 1919135  (+21%)
Thread ops/sec = 135487

Operation latency (ns):
Count: 32000000 Average: 7304.9294  StdDev: 108530.28
Min: 132  Median: 3777.6012  Max: 91030902
Percentiles: P50: 3777.60 P75: 10169.89 P99: 24504.51 P99.9: 59721.59 P99.99: 1861151.83
```

Reviewed By: anand1976

Differential Revision: D37182983

Pulled By: pdillinger

fbshipit-source-id: a17eb05f25b832b6a2c1356f5c657e831a5af8d1
2022-06-17 13:08:45 -07:00