mirror of
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git
synced 2024-12-04 20:02:50 +00:00
Fix data block upper bound checking for iterator reseek case (#5883)
Summary: When an iterator reseek happens with the user specifying a new iterate_upper_bound in ReadOptions, and the new seek position is at the end of the same data block, the Seek() ends up using a stale value of data_block_within_upper_bound_ and may return incorrect results. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5883 Test Plan: Added a new test case DBIteratorTest.IterReseekNewUpperBound. Verified that it failed due to the assertion failure without the fix, and passes with the fix. Differential Revision: D17752740 Pulled By: anand1976 fbshipit-source-id: f9b635ff5d6aeb0e1bef102cf8b2f900efd378e3
This commit is contained in:
parent
f633994fef
commit
9c34cded08
|
@ -182,6 +182,33 @@ TEST_P(DBIteratorTest, IterSeekBeforePrev) {
|
|||
delete iter;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_P(DBIteratorTest, IterReseekNewUpperBound) {
|
||||
Random rnd(301);
|
||||
Options options = CurrentOptions();
|
||||
BlockBasedTableOptions table_options;
|
||||
table_options.block_size = 1024;
|
||||
table_options.block_size_deviation = 50;
|
||||
options.table_factory.reset(NewBlockBasedTableFactory(table_options));
|
||||
options.compression = kNoCompression;
|
||||
Reopen(options);
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(Put("a", RandomString(&rnd, 400)));
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(Put("aabb", RandomString(&rnd, 400)));
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(Put("aaef", RandomString(&rnd, 400)));
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(Put("b", RandomString(&rnd, 400)));
|
||||
dbfull()->Flush(FlushOptions());
|
||||
ReadOptions opts;
|
||||
Slice ub = Slice("aa");
|
||||
opts.iterate_upper_bound = &ub;
|
||||
auto iter = NewIterator(opts);
|
||||
iter->Seek(Slice("a"));
|
||||
ub = Slice("b");
|
||||
iter->Seek(Slice("aabc"));
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(iter->Valid());
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(iter->key().ToString(), "aaef");
|
||||
delete iter;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_P(DBIteratorTest, IterSeekForPrevBeforeNext) {
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(Put("a", "b"));
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(Put("c", "d"));
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2825,11 +2825,21 @@ void BlockBasedTableIterator<TBlockIter, TValue>::SeekImpl(
|
|||
// Index contains the first key of the block, and it's >= target.
|
||||
// We can defer reading the block.
|
||||
is_at_first_key_from_index_ = true;
|
||||
// ResetDataIter() will invalidate block_iter_. Thus, there is no need to
|
||||
// call CheckDataBlockWithinUpperBound() to check for iterate_upper_bound
|
||||
// as that will be done later when the data block is actually read.
|
||||
ResetDataIter();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Need to use the data block.
|
||||
if (!same_block) {
|
||||
InitDataBlock();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// When the user does a reseek, the iterate_upper_bound might have
|
||||
// changed. CheckDataBlockWithinUpperBound() needs to be called
|
||||
// explicitly if the reseek ends up in the same data block.
|
||||
// If the reseek ends up in a different block, InitDataBlock() will do
|
||||
// the iterator upper bound check.
|
||||
CheckDataBlockWithinUpperBound();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (target) {
|
||||
|
@ -2840,7 +2850,6 @@ void BlockBasedTableIterator<TBlockIter, TValue>::SeekImpl(
|
|||
FindKeyForward();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
CheckDataBlockWithinUpperBound();
|
||||
CheckOutOfBound();
|
||||
|
||||
if (target) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue