mirror of
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git
synced 2024-11-26 07:30:54 +00:00
disableWAL with WriteImplWALOnly
Summary: Currently WriteImplWALOnly simply returns when disableWAL is set. This is an incorrect behavior since it does not allocated the sequence number, which is a side-effect of writing to the WAL. This patch fixes the issue. Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3262 Differential Revision: D6550974 Pulled By: maysamyabandeh fbshipit-source-id: 745a83ae8f04e7ca6c8ffb247d6ef16c287c52e7
This commit is contained in:
parent
35dfbd58dd
commit
546a63272f
|
@ -521,9 +521,6 @@ Status DBImpl::WriteImplWALOnly(const WriteOptions& write_options,
|
|||
PERF_TIMER_GUARD(write_pre_and_post_process_time);
|
||||
WriteThread::Writer w(write_options, my_batch, callback, log_ref,
|
||||
true /* disable_memtable */, pre_release_callback);
|
||||
if (write_options.disableWAL) {
|
||||
return status;
|
||||
}
|
||||
RecordTick(stats_, WRITE_WITH_WAL);
|
||||
StopWatch write_sw(env_, immutable_db_options_.statistics.get(), DB_WRITE);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -580,7 +577,13 @@ Status DBImpl::WriteImplWALOnly(const WriteOptions& write_options,
|
|||
// LastAllocatedSequence is increased inside WriteToWAL under
|
||||
// wal_write_mutex_ to ensure ordered events in WAL
|
||||
size_t seq_inc = seq_per_batch_ ? write_group.size : 0 /*total_count*/;
|
||||
status = ConcurrentWriteToWAL(write_group, log_used, &last_sequence, seq_inc);
|
||||
if (!write_options.disableWAL) {
|
||||
status =
|
||||
ConcurrentWriteToWAL(write_group, log_used, &last_sequence, seq_inc);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Otherwise we inc seq number to do solely the seq allocation
|
||||
last_sequence = versions_->FetchAddLastAllocatedSequence(seq_inc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
auto curr_seq = last_sequence + 1;
|
||||
for (auto* writer : write_group) {
|
||||
if (writer->CallbackFailed()) {
|
||||
|
@ -593,6 +596,7 @@ Status DBImpl::WriteImplWALOnly(const WriteOptions& write_options,
|
|||
// else seq advances only by memtable writes
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (status.ok() && write_options.sync) {
|
||||
assert(!write_options.disableWAL);
|
||||
// Requesting sync with two_write_queues_ is expected to be very rare. We
|
||||
// hance provide a simple implementation that is not necessarily efficient.
|
||||
if (manual_wal_flush_) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue