mirror of https://github.com/google/benchmark.git
317 lines
12 KiB
C++
317 lines
12 KiB
C++
#include <random>
|
|
#include <thread>
|
|
|
|
#include "../src/perf_counters.h"
|
|
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
|
|
|
#ifndef GTEST_SKIP
|
|
struct MsgHandler {
|
|
void operator=(std::ostream&) {}
|
|
};
|
|
#define GTEST_SKIP() return MsgHandler() = std::cout
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
using benchmark::internal::PerfCounters;
|
|
using benchmark::internal::PerfCountersMeasurement;
|
|
using benchmark::internal::PerfCounterValues;
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
const char kGenericPerfEvent1[] = "CYCLES";
|
|
const char kGenericPerfEvent2[] = "BRANCHES";
|
|
const char kGenericPerfEvent3[] = "INSTRUCTIONS";
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, Init) {
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(PerfCounters::Initialize(), PerfCounters::kSupported);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, OneCounter) {
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
GTEST_SKIP() << "Performance counters not supported.\n";
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent1}).num_counters(), 1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, NegativeTest) {
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
// Sanity checks
|
|
// Create() will always create a valid object, even if passed no or
|
|
// wrong arguments as the new behavior is to warn and drop unsupported
|
|
// counters
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(PerfCounters::Create({}).num_counters(), 0);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(PerfCounters::Create({""}).num_counters(), 0);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(PerfCounters::Create({"not a counter name"}).num_counters(), 0);
|
|
{
|
|
// Try sneaking in a bad egg to see if it is filtered out. The
|
|
// number of counters has to be two, not zero
|
|
auto counter =
|
|
PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent2, "", kGenericPerfEvent1});
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(counter.num_counters(), 2);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(counter.names(), std::vector<std::string>(
|
|
{kGenericPerfEvent2, kGenericPerfEvent1}));
|
|
}
|
|
{
|
|
// Try sneaking in an outrageous counter, like a fat finger mistake
|
|
auto counter = PerfCounters::Create(
|
|
{kGenericPerfEvent3, "not a counter name", kGenericPerfEvent1});
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(counter.num_counters(), 2);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(counter.names(), std::vector<std::string>(
|
|
{kGenericPerfEvent3, kGenericPerfEvent1}));
|
|
}
|
|
{
|
|
// Finally try a golden input - it should like all them
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(PerfCounters::Create(
|
|
{kGenericPerfEvent1, kGenericPerfEvent2, kGenericPerfEvent3})
|
|
.num_counters(),
|
|
3);
|
|
}
|
|
{
|
|
// Add a bad apple in the end of the chain to check the edges
|
|
auto counter = PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent1, kGenericPerfEvent2,
|
|
kGenericPerfEvent3,
|
|
"MISPREDICTED_BRANCH_RETIRED"});
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(counter.num_counters(), 3);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(counter.names(),
|
|
std::vector<std::string>({kGenericPerfEvent1, kGenericPerfEvent2,
|
|
kGenericPerfEvent3}));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, Read1Counter) {
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
GTEST_SKIP() << "Test skipped because libpfm is not supported.\n";
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
auto counters = PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent1});
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(counters.num_counters(), 1);
|
|
PerfCounterValues values1(1);
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counters.Snapshot(&values1));
|
|
EXPECT_GT(values1[0], 0);
|
|
PerfCounterValues values2(1);
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counters.Snapshot(&values2));
|
|
EXPECT_GT(values2[0], 0);
|
|
EXPECT_GT(values2[0], values1[0]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, Read2Counters) {
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
GTEST_SKIP() << "Test skipped because libpfm is not supported.\n";
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
auto counters =
|
|
PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent1, kGenericPerfEvent2});
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(counters.num_counters(), 2);
|
|
PerfCounterValues values1(2);
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counters.Snapshot(&values1));
|
|
EXPECT_GT(values1[0], 0);
|
|
EXPECT_GT(values1[1], 0);
|
|
PerfCounterValues values2(2);
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counters.Snapshot(&values2));
|
|
EXPECT_GT(values2[0], 0);
|
|
EXPECT_GT(values2[1], 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, ReopenExistingCounters) {
|
|
// This test works in recent and old Intel hardware
|
|
// However we cannot make assumptions beyond 3 HW counters
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
GTEST_SKIP() << "Test skipped because libpfm is not supported.\n";
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
std::vector<std::string> kMetrics({kGenericPerfEvent1});
|
|
std::vector<PerfCounters> counters(3);
|
|
for (auto& counter : counters) {
|
|
counter = PerfCounters::Create(kMetrics);
|
|
}
|
|
PerfCounterValues values(1);
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counters[0].Snapshot(&values));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counters[1].Snapshot(&values));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counters[2].Snapshot(&values));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, CreateExistingMeasurements) {
|
|
// The test works (i.e. causes read to fail) for the assumptions
|
|
// about hardware capabilities (i.e. small number (3) hardware
|
|
// counters) at this date,
|
|
// the same as previous test ReopenExistingCounters.
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
GTEST_SKIP() << "Test skipped because libpfm is not supported.\n";
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
|
|
// This means we will try 10 counters but we can only guarantee
|
|
// for sure at this time that only 3 will work. Perhaps in the future
|
|
// we could use libpfm to query for the hardware limits on this
|
|
// particular platform.
|
|
const int kMaxCounters = 10;
|
|
const int kMinValidCounters = 3;
|
|
|
|
// Let's use a ubiquitous counter that is guaranteed to work
|
|
// on all platforms
|
|
const std::vector<std::string> kMetrics{"cycles"};
|
|
|
|
// Cannot create a vector of actual objects because the
|
|
// copy constructor of PerfCounters is deleted - and so is
|
|
// implicitly deleted on PerfCountersMeasurement too
|
|
std::vector<std::unique_ptr<PerfCountersMeasurement>>
|
|
perf_counter_measurements;
|
|
|
|
perf_counter_measurements.reserve(kMaxCounters);
|
|
for (int j = 0; j < kMaxCounters; ++j) {
|
|
perf_counter_measurements.emplace_back(
|
|
new PerfCountersMeasurement(kMetrics));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
std::vector<std::pair<std::string, double>> measurements;
|
|
|
|
// Start all counters together to see if they hold
|
|
int max_counters = kMaxCounters;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < kMaxCounters; ++i) {
|
|
auto& counter(*perf_counter_measurements[i]);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(counter.num_counters(), 1);
|
|
if (!counter.Start()) {
|
|
max_counters = i;
|
|
break;
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_GE(max_counters, kMinValidCounters);
|
|
|
|
// Start all together
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < max_counters; ++i) {
|
|
auto& counter(*perf_counter_measurements[i]);
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counter.Stop(measurements) || (i >= kMinValidCounters));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Start/stop individually
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < max_counters; ++i) {
|
|
auto& counter(*perf_counter_measurements[i]);
|
|
measurements.clear();
|
|
counter.Start();
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counter.Stop(measurements) || (i >= kMinValidCounters));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We try to do some meaningful work here but the compiler
|
|
// insists in optimizing away our loop so we had to add a
|
|
// no-optimize macro. In case it fails, we added some entropy
|
|
// to this pool as well.
|
|
|
|
BENCHMARK_DONT_OPTIMIZE size_t do_work() {
|
|
static std::mt19937 rd{std::random_device{}()};
|
|
static std::uniform_int_distribution<size_t> mrand(0, 10);
|
|
const size_t kNumLoops = 1000000;
|
|
size_t sum = 0;
|
|
for (size_t j = 0; j < kNumLoops; ++j) {
|
|
sum += mrand(rd);
|
|
}
|
|
benchmark::DoNotOptimize(sum);
|
|
return sum;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void measure(size_t threadcount, PerfCounterValues* before,
|
|
PerfCounterValues* after) {
|
|
BM_CHECK_NE(before, nullptr);
|
|
BM_CHECK_NE(after, nullptr);
|
|
std::vector<std::thread> threads(threadcount);
|
|
auto work = [&]() { BM_CHECK(do_work() > 1000); };
|
|
|
|
// We need to first set up the counters, then start the threads, so the
|
|
// threads would inherit the counters. But later, we need to first destroy
|
|
// the thread pool (so all the work finishes), then measure the counters. So
|
|
// the scopes overlap, and we need to explicitly control the scope of the
|
|
// threadpool.
|
|
auto counters =
|
|
PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent1, kGenericPerfEvent3});
|
|
for (auto& t : threads) t = std::thread(work);
|
|
counters.Snapshot(before);
|
|
for (auto& t : threads) t.join();
|
|
counters.Snapshot(after);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, MultiThreaded) {
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
GTEST_SKIP() << "Test skipped because libpfm is not supported.";
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
PerfCounterValues before(2);
|
|
PerfCounterValues after(2);
|
|
|
|
// Notice that this test will work even if we taskset it to a single CPU
|
|
// In this case the threads will run sequentially
|
|
// Start two threads and measure the number of combined cycles and
|
|
// instructions
|
|
measure(2, &before, &after);
|
|
std::vector<double> Elapsed2Threads{
|
|
static_cast<double>(after[0] - before[0]),
|
|
static_cast<double>(after[1] - before[1])};
|
|
|
|
// Start four threads and measure the number of combined cycles and
|
|
// instructions
|
|
measure(4, &before, &after);
|
|
std::vector<double> Elapsed4Threads{
|
|
static_cast<double>(after[0] - before[0]),
|
|
static_cast<double>(after[1] - before[1])};
|
|
|
|
// Some extra work will happen on the main thread - like joining the threads
|
|
// - so the ratio won't be quite 2.0, but very close.
|
|
EXPECT_GE(Elapsed4Threads[0], 1.9 * Elapsed2Threads[0]);
|
|
EXPECT_GE(Elapsed4Threads[1], 1.9 * Elapsed2Threads[1]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, HardwareLimits) {
|
|
// The test works (i.e. causes read to fail) for the assumptions
|
|
// about hardware capabilities (i.e. small number (3-4) hardware
|
|
// counters) at this date,
|
|
// the same as previous test ReopenExistingCounters.
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
GTEST_SKIP() << "Test skipped because libpfm is not supported.\n";
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
|
|
// Taken straight from `perf list` on x86-64
|
|
// Got all hardware names since these are the problematic ones
|
|
std::vector<std::string> counter_names{"cycles", // leader
|
|
"instructions",
|
|
"branches",
|
|
"L1-dcache-loads",
|
|
"L1-dcache-load-misses",
|
|
"L1-dcache-prefetches",
|
|
"L1-icache-load-misses", // leader
|
|
"L1-icache-loads",
|
|
"branch-load-misses",
|
|
"branch-loads",
|
|
"dTLB-load-misses",
|
|
"dTLB-loads",
|
|
"iTLB-load-misses", // leader
|
|
"iTLB-loads",
|
|
"branch-instructions",
|
|
"branch-misses",
|
|
"cache-misses",
|
|
"cache-references",
|
|
"stalled-cycles-backend", // leader
|
|
"stalled-cycles-frontend"};
|
|
|
|
// In the off-chance that some of these values are not supported,
|
|
// we filter them out so the test will complete without failure
|
|
// albeit it might not actually test the grouping on that platform
|
|
std::vector<std::string> valid_names;
|
|
for (const std::string& name : counter_names) {
|
|
if (PerfCounters::IsCounterSupported(name)) {
|
|
valid_names.push_back(name);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
PerfCountersMeasurement counter(valid_names);
|
|
|
|
std::vector<std::pair<std::string, double>> measurements;
|
|
|
|
counter.Start();
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counter.Stop(measurements));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} // namespace
|