From 437fea4b549a449ac319618552981cb328f1aaf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Bilger Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 16:32:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix Python manual timing example (#1722) According to the user guide, when manual timing, it is necessary to explicit it by using the `UseManualTime` function. Its equivalent in Python is use_manual_time(). This function was not called in the example. It is possible to verify that the use of this function has an impact on the measure by adding another `time.sleep(0.01)` at the end of the iteration. There is a x2 difference depending on whether `use_manual_time()` is used or not. Co-authored-by: dominic <510002+dmah42@users.noreply.github.com> --- bindings/python/google_benchmark/example.py | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/bindings/python/google_benchmark/example.py b/bindings/python/google_benchmark/example.py index b5b2f88f..b92245ea 100644 --- a/bindings/python/google_benchmark/example.py +++ b/bindings/python/google_benchmark/example.py @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ def skipped(state): @benchmark.register +@benchmark.option.use_manual_time() def manual_timing(state): while state: # Manually count Python CPU time