benchmark/test/skip_with_error_test.cc

197 lines
6.4 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
#undef NDEBUG
#include <cassert>
#include <vector>
#include "../src/check.h" // NOTE: check.h is for internal use only!
#include "benchmark/benchmark.h"
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
namespace {
class TestReporter : public benchmark::ConsoleReporter {
public:
virtual bool ReportContext(const Context& context) BENCHMARK_OVERRIDE {
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
return ConsoleReporter::ReportContext(context);
};
virtual void ReportRuns(const std::vector<Run>& report) BENCHMARK_OVERRIDE {
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
all_runs_.insert(all_runs_.end(), begin(report), end(report));
ConsoleReporter::ReportRuns(report);
}
TestReporter() {}
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
virtual ~TestReporter() {}
mutable std::vector<Run> all_runs_;
};
struct TestCase {
std::string name;
bool error_occurred;
std::string error_message;
typedef benchmark::BenchmarkReporter::Run Run;
void CheckRun(Run const& run) const {
2021-06-24 17:21:59 +00:00
BM_CHECK(name == run.benchmark_name())
<< "expected " << name << " got " << run.benchmark_name();
2021-06-24 17:21:59 +00:00
BM_CHECK(error_occurred == run.error_occurred);
BM_CHECK(error_message == run.error_message);
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
if (error_occurred) {
2021-06-24 17:21:59 +00:00
// BM_CHECK(run.iterations == 0);
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
} else {
2021-06-24 17:21:59 +00:00
BM_CHECK(run.iterations != 0);
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
}
}
};
std::vector<TestCase> ExpectedResults;
int AddCases(const char* base_name, std::initializer_list<TestCase> const& v) {
for (auto TC : v) {
TC.name = base_name + TC.name;
ExpectedResults.push_back(std::move(TC));
}
return 0;
}
#define CONCAT(x, y) CONCAT2(x, y)
#define CONCAT2(x, y) x##y
#define ADD_CASES(...) int CONCAT(dummy, __LINE__) = AddCases(__VA_ARGS__)
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
} // end namespace
void BM_error_no_running(benchmark::State& state) {
state.SkipWithError("error message");
}
BENCHMARK(BM_error_no_running);
ADD_CASES("BM_error_no_running", {{"", true, "error message"}});
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
void BM_error_before_running(benchmark::State& state) {
state.SkipWithError("error message");
while (state.KeepRunning()) {
assert(false);
}
}
BENCHMARK(BM_error_before_running);
ADD_CASES("BM_error_before_running", {{"", true, "error message"}});
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
void BM_error_before_running_batch(benchmark::State& state) {
state.SkipWithError("error message");
while (state.KeepRunningBatch(17)) {
assert(false);
}
}
BENCHMARK(BM_error_before_running_batch);
ADD_CASES("BM_error_before_running_batch", {{"", true, "error message"}});
void BM_error_before_running_range_for(benchmark::State& state) {
state.SkipWithError("error message");
for (auto _ : state) {
assert(false);
}
}
BENCHMARK(BM_error_before_running_range_for);
ADD_CASES("BM_error_before_running_range_for", {{"", true, "error message"}});
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
void BM_error_during_running(benchmark::State& state) {
int first_iter = true;
while (state.KeepRunning()) {
Introduce accessors for currently public data members (threads and thread_index) (#1208) * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate the direct access to these fields. Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate the direct access to these fields. Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else.
2021-08-23 08:06:57 +00:00
if (state.range(0) == 1 && state.thread_index() <= (state.threads() / 2)) {
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
assert(first_iter);
first_iter = false;
state.SkipWithError("error message");
} else {
state.PauseTiming();
state.ResumeTiming();
}
}
}
BENCHMARK(BM_error_during_running)->Arg(1)->Arg(2)->ThreadRange(1, 8);
ADD_CASES("BM_error_during_running", {{"/1/threads:1", true, "error message"},
{"/1/threads:2", true, "error message"},
{"/1/threads:4", true, "error message"},
{"/1/threads:8", true, "error message"},
{"/2/threads:1", false, ""},
{"/2/threads:2", false, ""},
{"/2/threads:4", false, ""},
{"/2/threads:8", false, ""}});
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
void BM_error_during_running_ranged_for(benchmark::State& state) {
assert(state.max_iterations > 3 && "test requires at least a few iterations");
bool first_iter = true;
// NOTE: Users should not write the for loop explicitly.
for (auto It = state.begin(), End = state.end(); It != End; ++It) {
if (state.range(0) == 1) {
assert(first_iter);
first_iter = false;
(void)first_iter;
state.SkipWithError("error message");
// Test the unfortunate but documented behavior that the ranged-for loop
// doesn't automatically terminate when SkipWithError is set.
assert(++It != End);
break; // Required behavior
}
}
}
BENCHMARK(BM_error_during_running_ranged_for)->Arg(1)->Arg(2)->Iterations(5);
ADD_CASES("BM_error_during_running_ranged_for",
{{"/1/iterations:5", true, "error message"},
{"/2/iterations:5", false, ""}});
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
void BM_error_after_running(benchmark::State& state) {
for (auto _ : state) {
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
benchmark::DoNotOptimize(state.iterations());
}
Introduce accessors for currently public data members (threads and thread_index) (#1208) * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate the direct access to these fields. Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate the direct access to these fields. Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else.
2021-08-23 08:06:57 +00:00
if (state.thread_index() <= (state.threads() / 2))
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
state.SkipWithError("error message");
}
BENCHMARK(BM_error_after_running)->ThreadRange(1, 8);
ADD_CASES("BM_error_after_running", {{"/threads:1", true, "error message"},
{"/threads:2", true, "error message"},
{"/threads:4", true, "error message"},
{"/threads:8", true, "error message"}});
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
void BM_error_while_paused(benchmark::State& state) {
bool first_iter = true;
while (state.KeepRunning()) {
Introduce accessors for currently public data members (threads and thread_index) (#1208) * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate the direct access to these fields. Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate the direct access to these fields. Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else. * [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index` Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field Motivations: Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const). There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member) I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case. AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow. Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else.
2021-08-23 08:06:57 +00:00
if (state.range(0) == 1 && state.thread_index() <= (state.threads() / 2)) {
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
assert(first_iter);
first_iter = false;
state.PauseTiming();
state.SkipWithError("error message");
} else {
state.PauseTiming();
state.ResumeTiming();
}
}
}
BENCHMARK(BM_error_while_paused)->Arg(1)->Arg(2)->ThreadRange(1, 8);
ADD_CASES("BM_error_while_paused", {{"/1/threads:1", true, "error message"},
{"/1/threads:2", true, "error message"},
{"/1/threads:4", true, "error message"},
{"/1/threads:8", true, "error message"},
{"/2/threads:1", false, ""},
{"/2/threads:2", false, ""},
{"/2/threads:4", false, ""},
{"/2/threads:8", false, ""}});
2016-05-24 01:24:56 +00:00
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
benchmark::Initialize(&argc, argv);
TestReporter test_reporter;
benchmark::RunSpecifiedBenchmarks(&test_reporter);
typedef benchmark::BenchmarkReporter::Run Run;
auto EB = ExpectedResults.begin();
for (Run const& run : test_reporter.all_runs_) {
assert(EB != ExpectedResults.end());
EB->CheckRun(run);
++EB;
}
assert(EB == ExpectedResults.end());
return 0;
}