benchmark/test/user_counters_test.cc

218 lines
10 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
#undef NDEBUG
#include "benchmark/benchmark.h"
#include "output_test.h"
// ========================================================================= //
// ---------------------- Testing Prologue Output -------------------------- //
// ========================================================================= //
ADD_CASES(TC_ConsoleOut,
{{"^[-]+$", MR_Next},
{"^Benchmark %s Time %s CPU %s Iterations UserCounters...$", MR_Next},
{"^[-]+$", MR_Next}});
ADD_CASES(TC_CSVOut, {{"%csv_header,\"bar\",\"foo\""}});
// ========================================================================= //
// ------------------------- Simple Counters Output ------------------------ //
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
// ========================================================================= //
void BM_Counters_Simple(benchmark::State& state) {
while (state.KeepRunning()) {
}
state.counters["foo"] = 1;
2017-05-01 21:22:11 +00:00
state.counters["bar"] = 2 * (double)state.iterations();
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
}
BENCHMARK(BM_Counters_Simple);
ADD_CASES(TC_ConsoleOut, {{"^BM_Counters_Simple %console_report bar=%hrfloat foo=%hrfloat$"}});
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
ADD_CASES(TC_JSONOut, {{"\"name\": \"BM_Counters_Simple\",$"},
{"\"iterations\": %int,$", MR_Next},
Json reporter: don't cast floating-point to int; adjust tooling (#426) * Json reporter: passthrough fp, don't cast it to int; adjust tooling Json output format is generally meant for further processing using some automated tools. Thus, it makes sense not to intentionally limit the precision of the values contained in the report. As it can be seen, FormatKV() for doubles, used %.2f format, which was meant to preserve at least some of the precision. However, before that function is ever called, the doubles were already cast to the integer via RoundDouble()... This is also the case for console reporter, where it makes sense because the screen space is limited, and this reporter, however the CSV reporter does output some( decimal digits. Thus i can only conclude that the loss of the precision was not really considered, so i have decided to adjust the code of the json reporter to output the full fp precision. There can be several reasons why that is the right thing to do, the bigger the time_unit used, the greater the precision loss, so i'd say any sort of further processing (like e.g. tools/compare_bench.py does) is best done on the values with most precision. Also, that cast skewed the data away from zero, which i think may or may not result in false- positives/negatives in the output of tools/compare_bench.py * Json reporter: FormatKV(double): address review note * tools/gbench/report.py: skip benchmarks with different time units While it may be useful to teach it to operate on the measurements with different time units, which is now possible since floats are stored, and not the integers, but for now at least doing such a sanity-checking is better than providing misinformation.
2017-07-24 23:13:55 +00:00
{"\"real_time\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"cpu_time\": %float,$", MR_Next},
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
{"\"time_unit\": \"ns\",$", MR_Next},
{"\"bar\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"foo\": %float$", MR_Next},
{"}", MR_Next}});
ADD_CASES(TC_CSVOut, {{"^\"BM_Counters_Simple\",%csv_report,%float,%float$"}});
2017-04-29 21:27:55 +00:00
// VS2013 does not allow this function to be passed as a lambda argument
// to CHECK_BENCHMARK_RESULTS()
void CheckSimple(Results const& e) {
2017-04-28 19:45:30 +00:00
double its = e.GetAs< double >("iterations");
CHECK_COUNTER_VALUE(e, int, "foo", EQ, 1);
2017-04-28 19:45:30 +00:00
// check that the value of bar is within 0.1% of the expected value
CHECK_FLOAT_COUNTER_VALUE(e, "bar", EQ, 2.*its, 0.001);
2017-04-29 21:27:55 +00:00
}
CHECK_BENCHMARK_RESULTS("BM_Counters_Simple", &CheckSimple);
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
// ========================================================================= //
// --------------------- Counters+Items+Bytes/s Output --------------------- //
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
// ========================================================================= //
namespace { int num_calls1 = 0; }
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
void BM_Counters_WithBytesAndItemsPSec(benchmark::State& state) {
while (state.KeepRunning()) {
}
state.counters["foo"] = 1;
state.counters["bar"] = ++num_calls1;
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
state.SetBytesProcessed(364);
state.SetItemsProcessed(150);
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
}
BENCHMARK(BM_Counters_WithBytesAndItemsPSec);
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
ADD_CASES(TC_ConsoleOut,
{{"^BM_Counters_WithBytesAndItemsPSec %console_report "
"bar=%hrfloat foo=%hrfloat +%hrfloatB/s +%hrfloat items/s$"}});
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
ADD_CASES(TC_JSONOut, {{"\"name\": \"BM_Counters_WithBytesAndItemsPSec\",$"},
{"\"iterations\": %int,$", MR_Next},
Json reporter: don't cast floating-point to int; adjust tooling (#426) * Json reporter: passthrough fp, don't cast it to int; adjust tooling Json output format is generally meant for further processing using some automated tools. Thus, it makes sense not to intentionally limit the precision of the values contained in the report. As it can be seen, FormatKV() for doubles, used %.2f format, which was meant to preserve at least some of the precision. However, before that function is ever called, the doubles were already cast to the integer via RoundDouble()... This is also the case for console reporter, where it makes sense because the screen space is limited, and this reporter, however the CSV reporter does output some( decimal digits. Thus i can only conclude that the loss of the precision was not really considered, so i have decided to adjust the code of the json reporter to output the full fp precision. There can be several reasons why that is the right thing to do, the bigger the time_unit used, the greater the precision loss, so i'd say any sort of further processing (like e.g. tools/compare_bench.py does) is best done on the values with most precision. Also, that cast skewed the data away from zero, which i think may or may not result in false- positives/negatives in the output of tools/compare_bench.py * Json reporter: FormatKV(double): address review note * tools/gbench/report.py: skip benchmarks with different time units While it may be useful to teach it to operate on the measurements with different time units, which is now possible since floats are stored, and not the integers, but for now at least doing such a sanity-checking is better than providing misinformation.
2017-07-24 23:13:55 +00:00
{"\"real_time\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"cpu_time\": %float,$", MR_Next},
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
{"\"time_unit\": \"ns\",$", MR_Next},
Json reporter: don't cast floating-point to int; adjust tooling (#426) * Json reporter: passthrough fp, don't cast it to int; adjust tooling Json output format is generally meant for further processing using some automated tools. Thus, it makes sense not to intentionally limit the precision of the values contained in the report. As it can be seen, FormatKV() for doubles, used %.2f format, which was meant to preserve at least some of the precision. However, before that function is ever called, the doubles were already cast to the integer via RoundDouble()... This is also the case for console reporter, where it makes sense because the screen space is limited, and this reporter, however the CSV reporter does output some( decimal digits. Thus i can only conclude that the loss of the precision was not really considered, so i have decided to adjust the code of the json reporter to output the full fp precision. There can be several reasons why that is the right thing to do, the bigger the time_unit used, the greater the precision loss, so i'd say any sort of further processing (like e.g. tools/compare_bench.py does) is best done on the values with most precision. Also, that cast skewed the data away from zero, which i think may or may not result in false- positives/negatives in the output of tools/compare_bench.py * Json reporter: FormatKV(double): address review note * tools/gbench/report.py: skip benchmarks with different time units While it may be useful to teach it to operate on the measurements with different time units, which is now possible since floats are stored, and not the integers, but for now at least doing such a sanity-checking is better than providing misinformation.
2017-07-24 23:13:55 +00:00
{"\"bytes_per_second\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"items_per_second\": %float,$", MR_Next},
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
{"\"bar\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"foo\": %float$", MR_Next},
{"}", MR_Next}});
ADD_CASES(TC_CSVOut, {{"^\"BM_Counters_WithBytesAndItemsPSec\","
"%csv_bytes_items_report,%float,%float$"}});
2017-04-29 21:27:55 +00:00
// VS2013 does not allow this function to be passed as a lambda argument
// to CHECK_BENCHMARK_RESULTS()
void CheckBytesAndItemsPSec(Results const& e) {
double t = e.DurationCPUTime(); // this (and not real time) is the time used
CHECK_COUNTER_VALUE(e, int, "foo", EQ, 1);
CHECK_COUNTER_VALUE(e, int, "bar", EQ, num_calls1);
2017-04-28 19:45:30 +00:00
// check that the values are within 0.1% of the expected values
CHECK_FLOAT_RESULT_VALUE(e, "bytes_per_second", EQ, 364./t, 0.001);
CHECK_FLOAT_RESULT_VALUE(e, "items_per_second", EQ, 150./t, 0.001);
2017-04-29 21:27:55 +00:00
}
CHECK_BENCHMARK_RESULTS("BM_Counters_WithBytesAndItemsPSec",
&CheckBytesAndItemsPSec);
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
// ========================================================================= //
// ------------------------- Rate Counters Output -------------------------- //
// ========================================================================= //
void BM_Counters_Rate(benchmark::State& state) {
while (state.KeepRunning()) {
}
namespace bm = benchmark;
state.counters["foo"] = bm::Counter{1, bm::Counter::kIsRate};
state.counters["bar"] = bm::Counter{2, bm::Counter::kIsRate};
}
BENCHMARK(BM_Counters_Rate);
ADD_CASES(TC_ConsoleOut, {{"^BM_Counters_Rate %console_report bar=%hrfloat/s foo=%hrfloat/s$"}});
ADD_CASES(TC_JSONOut, {{"\"name\": \"BM_Counters_Rate\",$"},
{"\"iterations\": %int,$", MR_Next},
Json reporter: don't cast floating-point to int; adjust tooling (#426) * Json reporter: passthrough fp, don't cast it to int; adjust tooling Json output format is generally meant for further processing using some automated tools. Thus, it makes sense not to intentionally limit the precision of the values contained in the report. As it can be seen, FormatKV() for doubles, used %.2f format, which was meant to preserve at least some of the precision. However, before that function is ever called, the doubles were already cast to the integer via RoundDouble()... This is also the case for console reporter, where it makes sense because the screen space is limited, and this reporter, however the CSV reporter does output some( decimal digits. Thus i can only conclude that the loss of the precision was not really considered, so i have decided to adjust the code of the json reporter to output the full fp precision. There can be several reasons why that is the right thing to do, the bigger the time_unit used, the greater the precision loss, so i'd say any sort of further processing (like e.g. tools/compare_bench.py does) is best done on the values with most precision. Also, that cast skewed the data away from zero, which i think may or may not result in false- positives/negatives in the output of tools/compare_bench.py * Json reporter: FormatKV(double): address review note * tools/gbench/report.py: skip benchmarks with different time units While it may be useful to teach it to operate on the measurements with different time units, which is now possible since floats are stored, and not the integers, but for now at least doing such a sanity-checking is better than providing misinformation.
2017-07-24 23:13:55 +00:00
{"\"real_time\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"cpu_time\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"time_unit\": \"ns\",$", MR_Next},
{"\"bar\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"foo\": %float$", MR_Next},
{"}", MR_Next}});
ADD_CASES(TC_CSVOut, {{"^\"BM_Counters_Rate\",%csv_report,%float,%float$"}});
2017-04-29 21:27:55 +00:00
// VS2013 does not allow this function to be passed as a lambda argument
// to CHECK_BENCHMARK_RESULTS()
void CheckRate(Results const& e) {
2017-04-28 19:45:30 +00:00
double t = e.DurationCPUTime(); // this (and not real time) is the time used
// check that the values are within 0.1% of the expected values
CHECK_FLOAT_COUNTER_VALUE(e, "foo", EQ, 1./t, 0.001);
CHECK_FLOAT_COUNTER_VALUE(e, "bar", EQ, 2./t, 0.001);
2017-04-29 21:27:55 +00:00
}
CHECK_BENCHMARK_RESULTS("BM_Counters_Rate", &CheckRate);
// ========================================================================= //
// ------------------------- Thread Counters Output ------------------------ //
// ========================================================================= //
void BM_Counters_Threads(benchmark::State& state) {
while (state.KeepRunning()) {
}
state.counters["foo"] = 1;
state.counters["bar"] = 2;
}
BENCHMARK(BM_Counters_Threads)->ThreadRange(1, 8);
ADD_CASES(TC_ConsoleOut, {{"^BM_Counters_Threads/threads:%int %console_report bar=%hrfloat foo=%hrfloat$"}});
ADD_CASES(TC_JSONOut, {{"\"name\": \"BM_Counters_Threads/threads:%int\",$"},
{"\"iterations\": %int,$", MR_Next},
Json reporter: don't cast floating-point to int; adjust tooling (#426) * Json reporter: passthrough fp, don't cast it to int; adjust tooling Json output format is generally meant for further processing using some automated tools. Thus, it makes sense not to intentionally limit the precision of the values contained in the report. As it can be seen, FormatKV() for doubles, used %.2f format, which was meant to preserve at least some of the precision. However, before that function is ever called, the doubles were already cast to the integer via RoundDouble()... This is also the case for console reporter, where it makes sense because the screen space is limited, and this reporter, however the CSV reporter does output some( decimal digits. Thus i can only conclude that the loss of the precision was not really considered, so i have decided to adjust the code of the json reporter to output the full fp precision. There can be several reasons why that is the right thing to do, the bigger the time_unit used, the greater the precision loss, so i'd say any sort of further processing (like e.g. tools/compare_bench.py does) is best done on the values with most precision. Also, that cast skewed the data away from zero, which i think may or may not result in false- positives/negatives in the output of tools/compare_bench.py * Json reporter: FormatKV(double): address review note * tools/gbench/report.py: skip benchmarks with different time units While it may be useful to teach it to operate on the measurements with different time units, which is now possible since floats are stored, and not the integers, but for now at least doing such a sanity-checking is better than providing misinformation.
2017-07-24 23:13:55 +00:00
{"\"real_time\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"cpu_time\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"time_unit\": \"ns\",$", MR_Next},
{"\"bar\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"foo\": %float$", MR_Next},
{"}", MR_Next}});
ADD_CASES(TC_CSVOut, {{"^\"BM_Counters_Threads/threads:%int\",%csv_report,%float,%float$"}});
2017-04-29 21:27:55 +00:00
// VS2013 does not allow this function to be passed as a lambda argument
// to CHECK_BENCHMARK_RESULTS()
void CheckThreads(Results const& e) {
CHECK_COUNTER_VALUE(e, int, "foo", EQ, e.NumThreads());
CHECK_COUNTER_VALUE(e, int, "bar", EQ, 2 * e.NumThreads());
2017-04-29 21:27:55 +00:00
}
CHECK_BENCHMARK_RESULTS("BM_Counters_Threads/threads:%int", &CheckThreads);
// ========================================================================= //
// ---------------------- ThreadAvg Counters Output ------------------------ //
// ========================================================================= //
void BM_Counters_AvgThreads(benchmark::State& state) {
while (state.KeepRunning()) {
}
namespace bm = benchmark;
state.counters["foo"] = bm::Counter{1, bm::Counter::kAvgThreads};
state.counters["bar"] = bm::Counter{2, bm::Counter::kAvgThreads};
}
BENCHMARK(BM_Counters_AvgThreads)->ThreadRange(1, 8);
ADD_CASES(TC_ConsoleOut, {{"^BM_Counters_AvgThreads/threads:%int %console_report bar=%hrfloat foo=%hrfloat$"}});
ADD_CASES(TC_JSONOut, {{"\"name\": \"BM_Counters_AvgThreads/threads:%int\",$"},
{"\"iterations\": %int,$", MR_Next},
Json reporter: don't cast floating-point to int; adjust tooling (#426) * Json reporter: passthrough fp, don't cast it to int; adjust tooling Json output format is generally meant for further processing using some automated tools. Thus, it makes sense not to intentionally limit the precision of the values contained in the report. As it can be seen, FormatKV() for doubles, used %.2f format, which was meant to preserve at least some of the precision. However, before that function is ever called, the doubles were already cast to the integer via RoundDouble()... This is also the case for console reporter, where it makes sense because the screen space is limited, and this reporter, however the CSV reporter does output some( decimal digits. Thus i can only conclude that the loss of the precision was not really considered, so i have decided to adjust the code of the json reporter to output the full fp precision. There can be several reasons why that is the right thing to do, the bigger the time_unit used, the greater the precision loss, so i'd say any sort of further processing (like e.g. tools/compare_bench.py does) is best done on the values with most precision. Also, that cast skewed the data away from zero, which i think may or may not result in false- positives/negatives in the output of tools/compare_bench.py * Json reporter: FormatKV(double): address review note * tools/gbench/report.py: skip benchmarks with different time units While it may be useful to teach it to operate on the measurements with different time units, which is now possible since floats are stored, and not the integers, but for now at least doing such a sanity-checking is better than providing misinformation.
2017-07-24 23:13:55 +00:00
{"\"real_time\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"cpu_time\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"time_unit\": \"ns\",$", MR_Next},
{"\"bar\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"foo\": %float$", MR_Next},
{"}", MR_Next}});
ADD_CASES(TC_CSVOut, {{"^\"BM_Counters_AvgThreads/threads:%int\",%csv_report,%float,%float$"}});
2017-04-29 21:27:55 +00:00
// VS2013 does not allow this function to be passed as a lambda argument
// to CHECK_BENCHMARK_RESULTS()
void CheckAvgThreads(Results const& e) {
CHECK_COUNTER_VALUE(e, int, "foo", EQ, 1);
CHECK_COUNTER_VALUE(e, int, "bar", EQ, 2);
2017-04-29 21:27:55 +00:00
}
CHECK_BENCHMARK_RESULTS("BM_Counters_AvgThreads/threads:%int",
&CheckAvgThreads);
// ========================================================================= //
// ---------------------- ThreadAvg Counters Output ------------------------ //
// ========================================================================= //
void BM_Counters_AvgThreadsRate(benchmark::State& state) {
while (state.KeepRunning()) {
}
namespace bm = benchmark;
state.counters["foo"] = bm::Counter{1, bm::Counter::kAvgThreadsRate};
state.counters["bar"] = bm::Counter{2, bm::Counter::kAvgThreadsRate};
}
BENCHMARK(BM_Counters_AvgThreadsRate)->ThreadRange(1, 8);
ADD_CASES(TC_ConsoleOut, {{"^BM_Counters_AvgThreadsRate/threads:%int %console_report bar=%hrfloat/s foo=%hrfloat/s$"}});
ADD_CASES(TC_JSONOut, {{"\"name\": \"BM_Counters_AvgThreadsRate/threads:%int\",$"},
{"\"iterations\": %int,$", MR_Next},
Json reporter: don't cast floating-point to int; adjust tooling (#426) * Json reporter: passthrough fp, don't cast it to int; adjust tooling Json output format is generally meant for further processing using some automated tools. Thus, it makes sense not to intentionally limit the precision of the values contained in the report. As it can be seen, FormatKV() for doubles, used %.2f format, which was meant to preserve at least some of the precision. However, before that function is ever called, the doubles were already cast to the integer via RoundDouble()... This is also the case for console reporter, where it makes sense because the screen space is limited, and this reporter, however the CSV reporter does output some( decimal digits. Thus i can only conclude that the loss of the precision was not really considered, so i have decided to adjust the code of the json reporter to output the full fp precision. There can be several reasons why that is the right thing to do, the bigger the time_unit used, the greater the precision loss, so i'd say any sort of further processing (like e.g. tools/compare_bench.py does) is best done on the values with most precision. Also, that cast skewed the data away from zero, which i think may or may not result in false- positives/negatives in the output of tools/compare_bench.py * Json reporter: FormatKV(double): address review note * tools/gbench/report.py: skip benchmarks with different time units While it may be useful to teach it to operate on the measurements with different time units, which is now possible since floats are stored, and not the integers, but for now at least doing such a sanity-checking is better than providing misinformation.
2017-07-24 23:13:55 +00:00
{"\"real_time\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"cpu_time\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"time_unit\": \"ns\",$", MR_Next},
{"\"bar\": %float,$", MR_Next},
{"\"foo\": %float$", MR_Next},
{"}", MR_Next}});
ADD_CASES(TC_CSVOut, {{"^\"BM_Counters_AvgThreadsRate/threads:%int\",%csv_report,%float,%float$"}});
2017-04-29 21:27:55 +00:00
// VS2013 does not allow this function to be passed as a lambda argument
// to CHECK_BENCHMARK_RESULTS()
void CheckAvgThreadsRate(Results const& e) {
CHECK_FLOAT_COUNTER_VALUE(e, "foo", EQ, 1./e.DurationCPUTime(), 0.001);
CHECK_FLOAT_COUNTER_VALUE(e, "bar", EQ, 2./e.DurationCPUTime(), 0.001);
2017-04-29 21:27:55 +00:00
}
CHECK_BENCHMARK_RESULTS("BM_Counters_AvgThreadsRate/threads:%int",
&CheckAvgThreadsRate);
2017-04-27 18:25:20 +00:00
// ========================================================================= //
// --------------------------- TEST CASES END ------------------------------ //
// ========================================================================= //
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { RunOutputTests(argc, argv); }